IP Spotlight

News from the intersection of intellectual property and business law

  • About IP Spotlight

    IP Spotlight provides news and information that is relevant to individuals who focus on the business aspects of intellectual property. Topics include licensing, due diligence, acquisition, and managing risk associated with patents, trademarks and copyrights.
  • About the Author

    Jim Singer is a partner in the Intellectual Property Practice Group of Pepper Hamilton LLP. Jim's practice focuses on helping businesses, institutional investors, venture capital groups and others identify, protect, maximize value, and reduce risk associated with intellectual property. For more details and contact information, select the "About" tab at the top of this page.
  • Categories

  • Disclaimer

    The content on this site represents information provided by the author as an individual, and it does not necessarily represent the views of Pepper Hamilton LLP or its clients. This site is provided for informational purposes only, and the content provided herein should not be considered to be a substitute for legal advice, nor does it establish an attorney-client relationship. For legal assistance, contact a legal practitioner who is licensed in your jurisdiction. The author makes no warranty of the accuracy of the information contained on this site.

The Telephone Gambit

Posted by Jim Singer on April 14, 2008

Theft.  Bribery.  Altered documents.  Intrigue.  And … patent attorneys? 

It’s not often that you can include “patent attorneys” in a list like the one above, but after reading Seth Shulman’s “The Telephone Gambit:  Chasing Alexander Graham Bell’s Secret“, I wonder if the book could serve as inspiration for something like “CSI:  USPTO”.  The book investigates the question:  did Alexander Graham Bell really invent the telephone, or did he steal the concept from Elisha Gray?  While Shulman is not the first to explore this question, Shulman has discovered new evidence in Bell’s laboratory notes, and the book details how that evidence prompted an investigation that included an unpublished provisional patent application (then known as a “caveat”), a corrupt USPTO examiner, and a suspicious patent interference proceeding.  In a fast-paced, compelling narrative, Shulman takes the reader along on his journey and uncovers a good bit of USPTO history in the process. 

Although the book is geared to appeal to anyone with an interest in historical mystery, those of us who practice in the intellectual property field will find the book especially interesting.  After all, there aren’t many other mysteries in which the patent attorney may be the mastermind of the crime.

For more details about the book and the author, you can visit the author’s website here.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>