Comments for IP Spotlight

Comment on Is Track I prioritized examination speeding up the patent application process? by Jim Singer

Jim Singer — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:48:40 +0000

Good question. I haven’t seen that scenario yet in our filings. Readers: has anyone seen this situation?

Comment on Is Track I prioritized examination speeding up the patent application process? by Brad

Brad — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:39:02 +0000

I would interested to know whether a continuation application filed under the new Track 1 program would likely be assigned to the same examiner as the parent application, or are there different examiners for Track 1 applications?

Comment on USPTO Private PAIR – Difficulty logging on? by Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:48:13 +0000

still doesnt work

Comment on Changes to U.S. patent law: what happens next by patent lawyer

patent lawyer — Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:09:52 +0000

The changes are fast approaching so this should be announced all over USA.

Comment on USPTO website posts information, seeks comments on implementation of patent reform law by Soneeta Mirza

Soneeta Mirza — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:19:21 +0000

this is the great work very nice
http://www.ball2011.com/

Comment on 11th Circuit: Employer not liable for copyright infringement by its employee without direct evidence of financial benefit by cielle

cielle — Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:09:04 +0000

I'm not a lawyer but it's give me enough ideas about laws regarding on employment. Thanks for sharing. I will bookmark it. _________________ http://jobsnsw.net/

Comment on Why License a Pending Patent Application? by margaret

margaret — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 19:51:39 +0000

Yes! i have a provisional patent that i would like to license out to the right company. Could you offer information on websites to advertise on? Thanks

Comment on Court ruling shows risk of “naked license” by The Terrible Towel and Naked Licensing « Pittsburgh Trademark Lawyer

The Terrible Towel and Naked Licensing « Pittsburgh Trademark Lawyer — Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:34:21 +0000

[...] general overview of naked licensing in the context of a recent Ninth Circuit decision, check out Jim Singer’s post from last [...]

Comment on Federal Circuit’s Ariad case offers cautionary words for the use of broad terms in patent claim by futbol

futbol — Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:03:58 +0000

All ’round well written article

Comment on Issues to consider when structuring medical device development and license agreements by Counselling London

Counselling London — Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:24:05 +0000

Great info. The doctor may help the manufacturer develop a new device, or the doctor may help test an existing device. In the first situation, the physician may assign or license intellectual property to the manufacturer in exhange for payment. In the second, the physician simply performs consulting services in exchange for a service fee.