<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USPTO Issues Guidance on Patentability of Computer Readable Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipspotlight.com/2010/01/28/uspto-issues-guidance-on-patentability-of-computer-readable-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipspotlight.com/2010/01/28/uspto-issues-guidance-on-patentability-of-computer-readable-media/</link>
	<description>News from the intersection of intellectual property and business law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 04:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://ipspotlight.com/2010/01/28/uspto-issues-guidance-on-patentability-of-computer-readable-media/#comment-3057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 21:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipspotlight.com/?p=786#comment-3057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are we all just a bunch of scared sheep?  The recent rejections of &quot;computer readable medium&quot; claims are in direct contradiction with case law.  A computer readable medium is just a way to claim a computer program.  It&#039;s no different than an &quot;apparatus&quot; claim or a &quot;method&quot; claim.  It&#039;s simply an additional type of claim the courts have sanctioned.  Doesn&#039;t the patent office have anything better to do?  I guarantee the courts will eventually slap the USPTO upside the head.  It&#039;s just a matter of time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we all just a bunch of scared sheep?  The recent rejections of &#8220;computer readable medium&#8221; claims are in direct contradiction with case law.  A computer readable medium is just a way to claim a computer program.  It&#8217;s no different than an &#8220;apparatus&#8221; claim or a &#8220;method&#8221; claim.  It&#8217;s simply an additional type of claim the courts have sanctioned.  Doesn&#8217;t the patent office have anything better to do?  I guarantee the courts will eventually slap the USPTO upside the head.  It&#8217;s just a matter of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Eligibility of Computer Readable Medium Claims &#171; 717 Madison Place</title>
		<link>http://ipspotlight.com/2010/01/28/uspto-issues-guidance-on-patentability-of-computer-readable-media/#comment-2408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patent Eligibility of Computer Readable Medium Claims &#171; 717 Madison Place]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipspotlight.com/?p=786#comment-2408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] All Things Pros blog and IP Spotlight blog have noted that David Kappos  issued a memo on January 26, 2010 in regard to the patent [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All Things Pros blog and IP Spotlight blog have noted that David Kappos  issued a memo on January 26, 2010 in regard to the patent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

